Skip to main content

EVOLUTION RELOADED: DECODING TREE OF LIFE AND THE DESCENT OF MAN

Excerpts from the book EVOLUTION RELOADED

"The latest in the series of defenses that tried to safeguard Darwinism came from Molecular Biology. Highly advanced and complicated research method called DNA Sequencing which could analyze human composition not at the levels of Morphology, Anatomy or Genetics, but at the level of molecules, supported Darwinism stating that chimpanzees and human beings shared the highest possible DNA sequences among all the existing animals. But this study also shed light on the denying fact that cats and cows, who according to Darwinism descended from a common ancestor along with human beings in the distant past, share 90% of DNA sequences with human beings. The same DNA sequencing also showed the contradictory fact that bananas share 60% DNA Sequences with human beings. Similarly, fruit fly and red Jungle fowl [a kind of chicken] share 60% DNA Sequences with human beings. These results speak themselves that DNA Sequencing cannot be used as a logical meter to validate a hypothesis that all the existing organisms have evolved from a common ancestor. Rather these results speak logically for the fact that all organisms of today evolved from more or less same source material. So far in the defense of Darwinism, scientists have waded through the realms of Morphology, Anatomy, Genetics and Molecular Biology.  And in the future if the developing cutting edge technologies permit us to analyze a smaller unit of life than that of DNA, we will certainly find that all organisms of today are related to each other more closely than we have so far known about it. 

In fact, Morphology, Anatomy, Embryology, Genetics and Molecular Biology can be useful in understanding some common features among different groups of living systems.  But when we use these studies to substantiate a dead theory we will be at a loss. For example, in Genetics the number of chromosomes of an organism cannot be used to understand the supposed relations among various living organisms. When Sable antelope [Artiodactyla Order], Reeves's muntjac [Artiodactyla Order], Parhyale hawaiensis [an Arthropod], Potato [a plant] and Man [Primate Order] have same number of 23 pairs of chromosomes, we cannot logically construct a theory of common descent using genetics as its foundation stone. Having 254 chromosomes cannot make hermit crabs anything superior to human beings. Possession of 1260 chromosomes by a fern called Ophioglossum reticulatum cannot make it the most evolved and highly placed species on the surface of the earth. Commonness among living systems can be accounted by other logical facts as well.  It is possible that various types of living systems undergoing development under similar kinds of environmental forces developed similar patterns in their structure.  So, in such a case, a common ancestry is not necessary to develop shared features by different living systems.  Similarly, it is possible that the primary source materials from which all organisms started their evolution had more or less similar chemical and physical properties and as a result all organisms of today came to possess more or less common features.

     Darwinism should be called as the king of evidences because in the history of rational research no other theory has got the attention that Darwinism has received and consequently this theory was accorded such an amount of intellectual defense in the form of compelling evidences.  At the same time, it should also be stated that no other theory in the field of academic research has received criticism and contempt as that of Darwin.  Opposition against this theory assumed the proportion of revolt in some places to such an extent that few state governments in the United States of America even banned the teaching of this theory to students in schools.  However, it remained as the forbidden fruit in the realm of rational research. As the effort to prohibit its learning mounted, people found it more and more curious. The author of the new evolution theory knows very well that anyone who is trying to counter Darwinism is not dealing with a hypothesis, but a cult that possessed its own evolutionary capacity. The time is still running in favor of Darwinism and any tirade against its propositions in no time can be interpreted as an attempted intellectual coup. But the author is also sure that at the end of the day it cannot fail to stand as a figment of imagination that nevertheless ignited the intellectual potentials of many generations of thinking people all over the world." The book is available on Google Play.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

EXODUS: FROM PARTITION TO PANDEMIC

Anyone who takes an impartial view of historical events cannot ever question the genuinity of suffering inflicted by the mass exodus during the partition of the subcontinent in 1947. Records variously mention about 10 to 12 million people as affected by the gruesome man-made tragedy in the recent history which was, however, unavoidable. Both India and Pakistan, in one way or another, washed their hands off the responsibility of the human tragedy, because there was a third player who could be held responsible for the cold-blooded acts of murder committed during the partition in 1947. After seven decades of this gruesome  man-made  tragedy. we are witnessing a mass exodus of the scale that cannot have a parallel in the recent history, save the exodus during partition. But, if we feign ignorance about it, or a section of media underplays it as irrelevant, or a section of the political  establishment bypasses it as a political conspiracy, it cannot stand to the tes...
Post a Comment
Read more

1984 SIKH GENOCIDE: RELlGIOUS BIGOTRY OR ECONOMIC FALLOUT?

" It is painful to recollect the events that followed the assassination of Indira Gandhi in 1984. The Sikh genocide of 1984, as it is called, however, is a subject of controversy, especially due to  the different dimensions in the conflict. The media and the contemporary literature widely referred to it as a shocking upsurge of religious bigotry because we are habituated to look at the events through a narrow and faulty vision which has been gifted to us by those intellectuals with long-dead colonial mindset. In this regard the book "What after Modi Sarkar?" comes up with new bold revealations. The author points out at the economic imbalance in the aflected areas, especially in upmarket areas of various cities, where the Sikh community maintained a willfully sustained economic imperialism. The corresponding deprivation felt by the rest of the communities powered the event in 1984. In fact, it was an event waiting to happen and the assassination of Indira Gan...
Post a Comment
Read more

WHAT AFTER MODI SARKAR? ALTERNATIVES BEYOND NEHRUVIAN SOCIALISM & HINDUTVA NATIONALISM

AVAILABLE ON GOOGLE PLAY This book is the first of the three books which come under the series POLITICAL PROPHESY. This book deals with the topic of ongoing political evolution in the Indian subcontinent, which, of course, has undeniable relations with its not yet fully discovered past and seemingly uncertain future. The second book in the series deals with the nature of an unavoidable socio-political upheaval that cannot fail to grapple the subcontinent in the not so distant future. The third book explores the emerging new facets of feudalism in what is presumably a digital age civilization with artificial intelligence and knowledge economy. This book is not intended to sabotage or tarnish Modi Sarkar, in the sense that criticism does not mean any effort to sabotage or tarnish something. This book must be seen as a sincere enquiry of an honest citizen who thinks about the future of India. On a very moderate scale the author of this book intents to look forward to the uncertain future ...
Post a Comment
Read more