Skip to main content

1984 SIKH GENOCIDE: RELlGIOUS BIGOTRY OR ECONOMIC FALLOUT?

"

It is painful to recollect the events that followed the assassination of Indira Gandhi in 1984. The Sikh genocide of 1984, as it is called, however, is a subject of controversy, especially due to  the different dimensions in the conflict. The media and the contemporary literature widely referred to it as a shocking upsurge of religious bigotry because we are habituated to look at the events through a narrow and faulty vision which has been gifted to us by those intellectuals with long-dead colonial mindset.

In this regard the book "What after Modi Sarkar?" comes up with new bold revealations. The author points out at the economic imbalance in the aflected areas, especially in upmarket areas of various cities, where the Sikh community maintained a willfully sustained economic imperialism. The corresponding deprivation felt by the rest of the communities powered the event in 1984.

In fact, it was an event waiting to happen and the assassination of Indira Gandhi became a circumstantial reason. It was an economic upheaval unguided by ideologies or principles. Brute force of man did a naked dance when either the government or the system itself failed to curtail the effects of a willfully sustained economic imperialism by the Sikh community. -

The book also notes that the Gujarat riot of 2002 was an instance of an economic fallout rather than an event of religious bigotry. Excerpts from the book follow.

"Moreover, the Gujarat riot was an economic phenomenon rather than a religious phenomenon. It was almost like the Sikh genocide  of  1984  which  should  also  be  categorized  as an  economic phenomenon rather than a religious phenomenon. We should not colour the Sikh massacre of 1984 with religion even though the media widely referred to it as communal holocaust. The Sikh genocide derived its urge from a widely percieved economic imperialism willfully sustained by the Sikh community all over India. There was a time when the Sikh community owned a huge share  of  transport  and  consumer  business  in  every  nook  and corner  of  India.  Further,  the  share  of  repatriated  income  of  the community was higher than that ot many other communities. As a result,  the community  enjoyed disproportionate  affluence  causing deprivation to the rest of the social sections. This serious economic imbalance willfully sustained by the Sikh community powered the events in 1984. Similar was the case with Gujarat in 2002. The Muslims in Gujarat enjoyed a higher rate of prosperity when compared to their counterparts in other states. The corresponding deprivation suffered by the majority community broke lose the norms of tolerance at an unfortunate time and caused the conflict. In this manner, the Gujarat riot of 2002 also owed its origin and development to a willfully sustained economic imbalance."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

EXODUS: FROM PARTITION TO PANDEMIC

Anyone who takes an impartial view of historical events cannot ever question the genuinity of suffering inflicted by the mass exodus during the partition of the subcontinent in 1947. Records variously mention about 10 to 12 million people as affected by the gruesome man-made tragedy in the recent history which was, however, unavoidable. Both India and Pakistan, in one way or another, washed their hands off the responsibility of the human tragedy, because there was a third player who could be held responsible for the cold-blooded acts of murder committed during the partition in 1947. After seven decades of this gruesome  man-made  tragedy. we are witnessing a mass exodus of the scale that cannot have a parallel in the recent history, save the exodus during partition. But, if we feign ignorance about it, or a section of media underplays it as irrelevant, or a section of the political  establishment bypasses it as a political conspiracy, it cannot stand to the tes...

WHAT AFTER MODI SARKAR? ALTERNATIVES BEYOND NEHRUVIAN SOCIALISM & HINDUTVA NATIONALISM

AVAILABLE ON GOOGLE PLAY This book is the first of the three books which come under the series POLITICAL PROPHESY. This book deals with the topic of ongoing political evolution in the Indian subcontinent, which, of course, has undeniable relations with its not yet fully discovered past and seemingly uncertain future. The second book in the series deals with the nature of an unavoidable socio-political upheaval that cannot fail to grapple the subcontinent in the not so distant future. The third book explores the emerging new facets of feudalism in what is presumably a digital age civilization with artificial intelligence and knowledge economy. This book is not intended to sabotage or tarnish Modi Sarkar, in the sense that criticism does not mean any effort to sabotage or tarnish something. This book must be seen as a sincere enquiry of an honest citizen who thinks about the future of India. On a very moderate scale the author of this book intents to look forward to the uncertain future ...